Neanderthal extinction may have been caused by sex, not fighting


Share post:

A new paper proposes that Homo sapiens may have been responsible for the extinction of Neanderthals not by violence, but through sex instead.

Making love, not war, might have been responsible for putting the Neanderthals on a path to extinction.

While about 2% of the genome of all living people from outside Africa is derived from Neanderthals, there is very little evidence that this process went the other way.

A new paper, published in the journal PalaeoAnthropology, raises the prospect that interbreeding with our ancestors would have reduced the number of Neanderthals breeding with each other, leading to their eventual extinction.

Neanderthals (left) and Homo sapiens (right) are the closest relatives of each other, and could interbreed [Credit: Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London, All Rights Reserved]

Though only 32 Neanderthal genomes have been sequenced to date, leaving it possible that the lack of Homo sapiens DNA in their genome is actually a quirk of sampling, the authors hope advances in DNA sequencing technology will be able to resolve this hypothesis by making more genomes available.

Professor Chris Stringer, the Museum’s Research Leader in Human Evolution, authored the new paper alongside colleague Dr. Lucile Crété.

Chris says, “Our knowledge of the interaction between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals has got more complex in the last few years, but it’s still rare to see scientific discussion of how the interbreeding between the groups actually happened.”

“We propose that this behavior could have led to the Neanderthals’ extinction if they were regularly breeding with Homo sapiens, which could have eroded their population until they disappeared.”

The first encounters of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens

Neanderthals and Homo sapiens diverged from each other around 600,000 years ago and evolved in very different areas of the world.

Fossils of Neanderthals have been found across Europe and Asia, reaching as far as southern Siberia. It is believed they spent at least 400,000 years evolving in this environment, adapting to a predominantly cooler climate than is found today.

Meanwhile, the ancestors of our own species evolved in Africa. It is currently uncertain whether Homo sapiens are the direct descendants of one group of ancient African hominins or are the result of mixing between different groups spread across the continent.

From genetic data, it looks like the two species first encountered each other when Homo sapiens began making occasional forays out of Africa about 250,000 years ago.

“Without knowing exactly what Neanderthals looked or behaved like, we can only speculate what Homo sapiens would have thought of their relatives,” Chris says.

Breeding between our Homo sapiens ancestors and their relatives has led to Neanderthal DNA in the genomes of many humans alive today [Credit: Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock]

“The language differences would probably have been greater than we could imagine, given the time depth of the separation, and would have been much larger than those between any modern languages.”

The language barrier may have been reinforced by the individual attributes of both species, with comparisons of Neanderthal and Homo sapiens suggesting that the brains and vocal apparatus of the species were different.

The genomes of Neanderthals also show that almost 600 genes were expressed differently between our species and theirs, particularly those associated with the face and voice.

Another prominent difference would have been the forehead, with Neanderthals possessing a prominent brow ridge that could have been used for social communication.

However, the signals these ridges were trying to convey could well have been lost on our ancestors. Some studies suggest that reduced brow ridges allowed Homo sapiens to turn instead to the eyebrows to convey a range of subtler, temporary signals.

In any event, these encounters eventually led to breeding between both species, but exactly how this occurred is also shrouded in mystery.

Neanderthal and Homo sapiens interbreeding

We know that our species interbred with Neanderthals since our relatives’ first genomes were sequenced.

However, the Neanderthal genes we have in us today are not the result of these early sporadic interactions Homo sapiens had when they first left Africa. Instead, they come from the much larger migrations that modern humans undertook around 60,000 years ago.

Interbreeding at this time may have been the result of mutual courtship or could have been less friendly. Encounters between separate groups of our closest living relatives, chimpanzees, show evidence of both behaviors.

Whether or not interbreeding was successful appears to depend on the exact pair that was breeding. So far there is no evidence of Homo sapiens genetics in Late Neanderthal genomes dating to between 40–60,000 years ago.

It is possible this is due to the process of hybridization itself, as some species are only capable of producing offspring in certain directions. For instance, pollen from the Capsella rubella plant can successfully fertilize Capsella grandiflora seeds, but not the other way around.

Individual Capsella grandiflora plants are only compatible in one direction with their relative Capsella rubella, which may also have affected breeding between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals [Credit: © Katie Flenker/Shutterstock]

The lack of mitochondrial DNA, which is inherited through females, from Neanderthals in living humans has been suggested as evidence that only male Neanderthals and female Homo sapiens could mate, but there is also some evidence that male hybrids may have been less fertile than females.

With fewer Neanderthals breeding with each other and group sizes already small and scattered due to the environment, hybridization outside of Neanderthal family groups could have helped push the species into decline. At the moment, however, there isn’t enough evidence to decide either way.

“We don’t know if the apparent one-way gene flow is because it simply wasn’t happening, that the breeding was taking place but was unsuccessful, or if the Neanderthal genomes we have are unrepresentative,” Chris says.

“As more Neanderthal genomes are sequenced, we should be able to see whether any nuclear DNA from Homo sapiens was passed on to Neanderthals and demonstrate whether or not this idea is accurate.”

Future research could also investigate similar questions relating to another hominin species known as the Denisovans, giving us a greater idea of how our species interacted with its closest relatives.

Author: James Ashworth | Source: Natural History Museum [October 31, 2022]



Related articles

Genetic admixture in the South Pacific: from Denisovans to the human immune response

Describing the genetic diversity of human populations is essential to improve our understanding of human diseases and their...

Research on British teeth unlocks potential for new insights into ancient diets

Researchers analysing the teeth of Britons from the Iron Age to the modern day have unlocked the potential...

Newly discovered fossil shows small-scale evolutionary changes in an extinct human species

Males of the extinct human species Paranthropus robustus were thought to be substantially larger than females -- much...

Earliest interbreeding event between ancient human populations discovered

For three years, anthropologist Alan Rogers has attempted to solve an evolutionary puzzle. His research untangles millions of...

Meat-heavy diets restricted hunter-gatherer population sizes

Hunter-gatherer populations with a strong seasonal dependence on meat in their diets had fewer people per square kilometer...

New study finds evidence of Neanderthal cannibalism and mobile modern humans driving mammoths to extinction

A new international study indicates that Neanderthals and early modern humans probably had very similar diets, contradicting the...

Kathmandu architect chronicles a dying culture

It is said that the medieval era never really ended in Nepal, its historic towns and architectural jewels...

These bones were made for walking

Perhaps the most profound advance in primate evolution occurred about 6 million years ago when our ancestors started...