Spatial methods for identifying unusual accumulations at Palaeolithic sites


Share post:

A collaboration between researchers at the Centro Nacional de Investigacion sobre la Evolucion Humana (CENIEH) and the Human Evolution Research Center (HERC) of the University of California at Berkeley has allowed a study to be published in the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, which reviews the traditional and more innovative methods for identifying unusual horizontal concentrations of archaeological materials at Palaeolithic sites, verifying data both for caves and in the open air.

Spatial methods for identifying unusual accumulations at Palaeolithic sites
Excavation at Amalda caves (Amalda III) [Credit: Joseba Rios Garaizar]

In addition to reviewing the existing methods, with their advantages and limitations, this study also conducted an identification of significant accumulations at specific sites, which could tell us about the distinct uses made of the space by human groups, as well as the site formation processes. This work helps us to a better understanding of site function and internal arrangement, with a view to elucidating the settlement patterns and economic and social organization of Palaeolithic societies.

This type of investigation using spatial analysis techniques has been under way over the last few decades through different methods, but it is enjoying a new lease of life recently thanks to the combination of GIS (Geographical Information Systems) environment methods and spatial statistics tests, which pick out the significant clusters of archaeopalaeontological materials.

“We started to apply these kinds of test to Palaeolithic sites at the CENIEH Digital Cartography and 3D Analysis Laboratory in 2016, and since then they have become widely used at sites all over the world”, says the geologist Alfonso Benito Calvo, one of the study’s co-authors.

This work is led by Laura Sanchez-Romero, postdoctoral researcher at the HERC, whose doctoral thesis put forward a unified spatial analysis methodology for Palaeolithic sites, independently of their context, the origin of the data, chronology or method of excavation.

Source: CENIEH [April 30, 2021]

Support The Archaeology News Network with a small donation!



Related articles

Newly discovered Iranian petroglyph panels under threat

Petroglyphs recently discovered at a site near the town of Gotvand in Iran are being threatened by the...

Researchers study pre-Hispanic funerary practices in north-western Argentina

For more than fifteen years, a research team from CONICET, led by María Cristina Scattolin, has been carrying...

Earliest evidence of lead pollution uncovered in the Balkans

New research from Northumbria University has revealed that metal-related pollution began in the Balkans more than 500 years...

First Americans used spear-throwers to hunt large animals

Despite a lack of archaeological evidence, the first North Americans have often been depicted hunting with spear-throwers, which...

Archaeologists discover lost city that may have conquered the kingdom of Midas

Archaeologists from the Oriental Institute have discovered a lost ancient kingdom dating to 1400 BC to 600 BC,...

Legionary canteen found at Roman sanctuary in France

During the course of rescue excavations at a site near a planned commercial area in the town of...

Mini-Pompeii may be hiding under modern-day Selinunte

A miniature Pompeii may be hiding beneath the temples in the Selinunte Archaeological Park in Sicily, according to...

Ancient art in Somaliland in diplomatic limbo

The world’s most famous prehistoric art is in caverns in Europe, but the most recently discovered ancient cave...