Newly discovered pliosaur terrorised ancient Russian seas


Share post:

The Mesozoic played host to some of the most dangerous predators to ever swim the Earth’s oceans. Among these, pliosaurs were lethal hunters, and some of the largest predators ever on this planet. They were the shorter-necked cousins of the plesiosaurs, which are often spoken of in reference to their superficial similarity to the Loch Ness Monster, which we’re definitely not going to do here. Together, pliosaurs and plesiosaurs form a group known as Sauropterygia, which existed in the oceans from the Triassic right until the end of the Cretaceous, when they went extinct along with the non-avian dinosaurs and other vertebrate groups. This actually makes sauropterygians the longest living group of marine-adapted tetrapods (animals with four limbs), which is quite an impressive feat!

Newly discovered pliosaur terrorised ancient Russian seas
Fossils of the new pliosaur, Makhaira [Credit: Fischer et al. 2015]

New discoveries show that perhaps this evolutionary success can be attributed to the ecological diversity that this group possessed, and in particular an ability to adapt to different feeding styles.

Valentin Fischer from the University of Oxford and an international team of researchers have discovered a new pliosaur from western Russia, named Makhaira rossica. The name dreives from the Latinized Ancient Greek word ‘mákhaira’, which describes a blade with a curved outline, as well as the Latin word ‘rossica’, which means Russian. The specimen comprises a fragmentary skeleton of a sub-adult animal, found within a series of limestone nodules along the banks of the Volga River.

Makhaira comes from a period in Earth’s geological history, known as the earliest part of the Cretaceous, where our knowledge of vertebrate life is relatively poor due to the way in which fossils are differentially preserved through time. Sadly, this lack of knowledge means that our understanding of how faunas changed from the latest part of the Jurassic period into the first part of the Cretaceous is relatively poor compared to other important geological boundaries.

Analysis of the evolutionary placement of this new species places it as the most basal member of a group known as Brachaucheninae, which survived through the Cretaceous. However, the new species is different in being a little smaller than some of its more advanced relatives.

Newly discovered pliosaur terrorised ancient Russian seas
Evolutionary relationships of Makhaira with other Jurassic and Cretaceous pliosaurs 
[Credit: Fischer et al. 2015]

The weirdest feature of the new beasty has to be the teeth. The teeth occur in pairs, and have a trihedral form, meaning they had three peaks on each alveolus, and the edges of the teeth were adorned with wicked serrations. They were also very large, similar even to some teeth from theropod dinosaurs roaming the lands at the time!

The morphology of these teeth suggest that they were equipped just for one thing – devouring other large animals! This form of feeding is known as macrophagy, and was a common form of predation at the time for giant marine crocodyliforms (the ancestors of modern crocodiles) called metriorhynchids. Importantly, this feeding style previously seemed to have been lost in the early evolution of other brachauchenine pliosaurs, but now appears to have been present in at least one species from this group. This shows that Early Cretaceous pliosaurs were still well adapted to hypercarnivory, and retained a high feeding diversity at the beginning of the Cretaceous, and not lost from their Jurassic ancestors.

Recently, Alessandro Chiarenza, a colleague of mine at Imperial College London, reported on what appeared to be the oldest metriorhynchid remains currently known, from a fossil site in Sicily. Based on a single fossilised tooth from a period known as the Aptian, later on in the Cretaceous than when Makhaira was found, these remains extended the duration of metriorhynchids, and their eventual extinction, by several millions of years.

However, the morphology of the teeth of Makhaira wasn’t known at the time of publishing the crocodyliform fossils, and it seems that it is actually impossible to distinguish between these and the teeth of some metriorhynchids. This means that the Sicilian tooth cannot be referred unequivocally to either a metriorhynchid or a pliosaur – the teeth of some species is just too similar to say for certain! What does this imply though? Well, it seems that the fate of metriorhynchids is still a mystery concealed by the fossil record, and is only something that future study of these fossils, their other monstrous counterparts, and discovery of new fossils can hope to solve!

The findings are published in the Royal Society Open Science journal.

Author: Victoria Costello | Source: Public Library of Science [January 16, 2016]



Related articles

An estimated 8 million metric tons of plastic enters oceans each year

A plastic grocery bag cartwheels down the beach until a gust of wind spins it into the ocean....

Why do we still have mitochondrial DNA?

The mitochondrion isn't the bacterium it was in its prime, say two billion years ago. Since getting consumed...

More on Expansion of Rotterdam port turns up Stone Age artefacts

The site of what is now Rotterdam’s Yangtzehaven was inhabited by humans in the Middle Stone Age.  Archaeologists find...

NASA’s Cassini watches Saturn storm choke on its own tail

Call it a Saturnian version of the Ouroboros, the mythical serpent that bites its own tail. In a...

Crete celebrates World Tourism Day with free entrance to archaeological sites

World Tourism Day takes place annually on 27 September and this year is to be celebrated in Crete’s...

Study reveals origin of modern dog has a single geographic origin

By analyzing the DNA of two prehistoric dogs from Germany, an international research team led by Krishna R....

Ecologist warns of Australian ‘extinction crisis’

A Queensland ecologist is calling for a rethink of Australia's conservation strategy to combat an "extinction crisis".  Australia has...

Theory of ‘smart’ plants may explain the evolution of global ecosystems

It's easy to think of plants as passive features of their environments, doing as the land prescribes, serving...