New statistical formulas for assigning sex to human fossils

Date:

Share post:

Adrian Pablos, a scientist at the Centro Nacional de Investigacion sobre la Evolucion Humana (CENIEH), is a co-author of a recent publication in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, led by Carmen Alonso-Llamazares, of the Universidad de Oviedo, which offers new statistical formulas for assigning sex to fossils from human feet.

New statistical formulas for assigning sex to human fossils
Credit: CENIEH

Thanks to this study, more data about the paleobiology of human populations of the past can be obtained, and it opens up the possibility of using the same methodology to discover what representatives of the genus Homo of species different from our own were like. Furthermore, it is also applicable in forensic contexts for the identification of individuals.

Normally, when isolated human fossils are recovered from archaeological sites, it is very difficult to assign a sex to them. In the case of fossils from feet, it is usual to resort to mathematical formulas based on current populations, which enable an approximation to the sex of fossil individuals on the basis of the greater size of the men, in general, compared to the women within the same population.




However, as Pablos explains, “the problem is that there exist major differences between different populations, which means that the results are not very reliable when the formulas mentioned are applied to a population other than that used to calculate those mathematical formulas”.

In this study, different discriminant formulas were calculated using foot bones, such as the astragalus and the calcaneus, and to make the method more robust, those formulas were tested with individuals from the same population whence the formulas came, and likewise they were checked against formulas and data from other, different populations.

“Subsequently, these equations were put to the test again with fossils whose sex is known, to verify their reliability. In those cases where the reliability percentage was sufficiently high, these formulas were applied to fossils whose sex is unknown, thus conferring greater robustness upon the method”. comments Alonso-Llamazares.

Source: CENIEH [June 13, 2019]

ADVERTISEMENT

spot_img

Related articles

Ancient oral biome points to overall health

When a baby puts something from the floor in their mouth, we panic, but the mouth already contains...

Human mutation rate has slowed recently

Researchers from Aarhus University, Denmark, and Copenhagen Zoo have discovered that the human mutation rate is significantly slower...

Active participation in group-hunts earns wild chimpanzees meat access

Wild chimpanzees of the Taï National Park, Ivory Coast, hunt in groups to catch monkeys. By observing group-hunts...

Taking your time makes a difference – Brain development differs between Neanderthals and modern humans

Neanderthals are the closest relatives to modern humans. Comparisons with them can therefore provide fascinating insights into what...

Leaving money on the table to stay in the game

If given the chance, a Kenyan herder is likely to keep a mix of goats and camels. It...

New virtual reconstruction of a Neanderthal thorax suggests another breathing mechanism

Neanderthals were hunter-gatherers who inhabited western Eurasia for more than 200 thousand years during glacial as well as...

Scientific methods shed new light on evolution of kinship patterns

New biological methods used to trace the evolutionary history of kinship patterns shed new light on how societies...

New chimpanzee culture discovered

Chimpanzees have a more elaborate and diversified material culture than any other nonhuman primate. Their behavior varies across...