Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?


Share post:

Everyone is excited by discoveries of new dinosaurs – or indeed any new fossil species. But a key question for palaeontologists is ‘just how good is the fossil record?’ Do we know fifty per cent of the species of dinosaurs that ever existed, or ninety per cent or even less than one per cent? And how can we tell?

Just how good (or bad) is the fossil record of dinosaurs?
The pattern of discovery of new dinosaur species and new
dinosaur-bearing formations,

 as they accumulated through research time,
from 1820 to the present day

[Credit: University of Bristol]

It all depends on how we read the fossil record – the sum total of all the fossils in rocks and in museums. In a new study published today, Professor Mike Benton of the University of Bristol has explored how knowledge about dinosaurs has accumulated over the past 200 years, since the first dinosaur was named in 1824. His research does not answer the question once and for all, but it suggests that strong caution is needed with some popular methods to ‘correct’ the fossil record.

Professor Benton said: “In the past ten years, many palaeontologists have tried to find the true pattern of evolution by using measures of sampling to estimate where the fossil record is well known or poorly known. But it turns out that many of the popular methods are not doing what they are supposed to.’

Professor Benton reconstructed year-by-year, through the history of research on dinosaurs, from 1820 to 2015, how palaeontologists have discovered new species of dinosaurs, and how the patterns of discovery match the patterns of discovery of new geological formations. In fact, the patterns of discovery are closely linked: one or two new dinosaurs for each fossil-bearing geological formation that is newly explored.

This close linkage has been explained in two ways: either rocks drive fossils, or fossils drive rocks. The usual view was that rocks drive fossils: palaeontologists were keen to find new dinosaurs, but could only find them if they looked at new rocks in a new part of the world. Therefore, it could be said that the availability of appropriate rocks biases our knowledge of dinosaurs (or any other fossil group).

The opposite view is that fossils drive rocks, and that palaeontologists usually go out looking for dinosaurs in a very focused way,, and when they find them they would often add a new dinosaur-bearing formation to the list. In this case, the limiting factor is not simply the rocks, because palaeontologists do not search steadily and evenly over the ground, but they go straight to spots where they hear there are bones to be found.

“I have been worried for a while that some of the popular correction methods actually make things worse,” Professor Benton said. “By removing the numerical signal of the formations, localities, or collections they were actually removing a huge amount of real information, and producing a resulting curve that is meaningless.

“The fossil record is clearly incomplete, and it is clearly biased by many factors, but many of the supposedly ‘corrected’ diversity curves we have seen recently may actually be further from the truth than the raw data.”

The new work does not answer the question of whether we know 50 per cent of dinosaur species or less than one per cent. But it does provide a clearer picture of why there is such a close correlation between dinosaur species numbers with formations, localities or collections. The numbers of all four are connected because they are all telling pretty much the same story, and they are measuring the same history of knowledge. It is not possible to separate one or other of these measures from the others and then try to use it as an independent yardstick of sampling.

Source: University of Bristol [August 28, 2015]



Related articles

Fossilised microbe found in 200 million year old Leech cocoon

Palaeobiologists from the University of Kansas studying samples taken from the mountains of Antarctica have found a ciliate...

Astrophysics and Extinctions: News about planet-threatening events

Space is a violent place. If a star explodes or black holes collide anywhere in our part of...

10 die in Egypt while digging for ancient treasures

Ten people were killed when the soil caved in on them as they were illegally digging for ancient...

Titan dune puzzle explained

Titan, Saturn's largest moon, is a peculiar place. Unlike any other moon, it has a dense atmosphere. It...

Ring found in UK field ‘may be royal’

A sapphire ring found in a field by a metal detecting enthusiast is probably much older than originally...

Fossils fuel illegal excavations in China

Guizhou's Guanling is well known for its fossils but faces a race to preserve them as they are...

Flashback: Battling the Tomb Raiders of Latin America

Acting on a tip from police last year, archaeologist Walter Alva was led to an ancient burial ground...

SETI Institute calls for new tools in search for extraterrestrial intelligence

The SETI Institute Director of Research, proposed a broader, multidisciplinary approach to the SETI search, beyond radio and...