‘Common’ animal species are not that common and rare species are rare


Share post:

New research by Dr John Alroy in the Department of Biological Sciences suggests that current models describing the commonality and dominance of a few species in any one community are incorrect, and that there is actually a limit to the number of species thought of as ‘rare’.

'Common' animal species are not that common and rare species are rare

The research, published in Science Advances, is based on study of more than 1000 lists of species representing different ecological communities from around the world, from bats to trees to butterflies. It is the first study of its kind to include a global, diverse data set.

“The idea that communities of species are open to all newcomers goes back to theoretical work in the 1960s that argued in favour of certain mathematical models of communities. These models try to predict how many individuals belong to the most common species, and then to the second-most common one, and so on in any particular community,” said Dr Alroy.

Previous models assumed either that species compete for just a single resource or that competition is not strong. Dr Alroy explained the data with a new model that assumes species compete strongly for two resources, such as light and nutrients or physical space and water.

“Common species in these ecological communities are simply not that common. It’s almost never true that, for example, half of the individuals in any one place belong to a single species. Instead, there’s often no significant difference between the abundance of the dominant species and the abundance of the next few species down the line,” said Dr Alroy.

“For example, if you look at a group of frogs in a pond, there will generally be only a few species. Other species of frogs may try to join the community, but will be kept out by competition for resources. That’s why common species and rare species are both not seen very often.”

“In general, I found that there aren’t nearly as many rare species as most ecologists would lead you to believe. In most places, there is actually a fairly equal distribution of abundances. If this is true, then the species richness of ecological communities and of the entire globe could be quite strongly limited,” said Dr Alroy.

Dr Alroy will build on this research to study the impact of humans on ecological diversity.

Source: Macquarie University [September 28, 2015]



Related articles

Whale population size, dynamics determined based on ancient DNA

Estimates of whale population size based on genetics versus historical records diverge greatly, making it difficult to fully...

50,000 year old bison skull found in Crimea

A Ukrainian paleontological expedition has discovered a 50,000 year old bison skull in a cave in the Crimea,...

Fish ecosystem on Yangtze ‘on verge of collapse’

Human activity along the upper reaches of the Yangtze River - such as building hydropower stations and excessive...

Humans and sponges share gene regulation mechanisms

Humans have a lot in common with the humble sea sponge, according to research that changes the way...

Sea levels and extreme phenomena are evolving independently

The negative effects of climate change are becoming more and more intense and noticeable in the sea and...

Brainless ‘fish’ among aquatic wonders found in Scottish waters

A brainless and faceless "fish" was one of 15 species discovered during a series of Scottish marine surveys...

FBI returns Mayan artefacts to Guatemala

Seven ancient Mayan artifacts that were in the possession of a California collector were returned to Guatemala on...

Continental crust thanks to the right mixture

For the first time, ETH scientists have successfully recreated the formation of continental crust in the Archean using...